Election Methods

This forum is an archive for the mailing list election-methods@lists.electorama.com (more options) Messages posted here will be sent to this mailing list.
On election-methods-list, we discuss the nitty-gritty details of single-winner election reform, the relative merits of different proportional representation systems, and the technical underpinnings of all election methods. "election-methods-list" discussions tend to be technical in nature (or at least, very laden with jargon), with the ultimate goal of providing recommendations and educational material to the electoral reform movement. Those that want to have in-depth discussions about the technical subtleties of election methods can use "election-methods-list" to discuss those things without fear of reprisal from those who aren't interested.
1 ... 380381382383384385386 ... 388
Topics (13553)
Replies Last Post Views
Definition of "Pairwise Method" by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Calculating the Smith set? by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Calculating the Smith set? by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet Math in all Elections by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
mail woes (fwd) by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Sorry for the chaos by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Higher Majority Winner by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Definition of "Pairwise Method" by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Standards vs. Criteria (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's Re by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Calculating the Smith set? by Steve Eppley
0
by Steve Eppley
Standards vs. Criteria (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's Re by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Oregon Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 16 by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet misinterpretation (was Re: Arithmetic Errors) by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Definition of pairwise (was Re: Reply on EM to Mike's...) by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Which Condorcet tie breaker by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Dictionary Delaying-Tactic by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet computer count by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Bruce's part 2 reply to Steve by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Arithmetic Errors by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet computer count by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Explaining Condorcet for Single Winner Elections by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet computer count by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Arithmetic Errors by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Explaining Condorcet for Single Winner Elections by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Condorcet computer count by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Standards, Criteria, Formulese by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Bruce's part 2 reply to Steve by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
B wins in Bruce's 2 examples. by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Generalized Majority Rule (was Re: Bruce, Condorcet & Copeland) by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
(Fwd) STV and truncation by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Arithmetic Errors by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
My public Smith//Condorcet definition by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
Reply on EM to Mike's Reply on ER by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
(Fwd) STV and truncation by Craig Carey-2
0
by Craig Carey-2
1 ... 380381382383384385386 ... 388