To: Kevin Hornbuckle <[hidden email]>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 Kevin (who I think is not an election-methods subscriber) asked: >If you use pairwise in a multiseat election, can it be said to yield >proportional representation? I haven't thought about it before; my first thoughts are "no." It would seem to be like the system which asks each voter to vote N distinct choices in an N seat election: the same majority which elects the top choice can elect the rest, totally shutting out a minority. Example: 2 seats up for grabs Summary of the ranked ballots: 26% Dole, Alexander, Clinton 25% Alexander, Dole, Clinton 49% Clinton ---- 100% The pairings: Dole over Alexander by 1% (26-25+0) Dole over Clinton by 2% (26+25-49) Alexander over Clinton by 2% (26+25-49) The results: Dole undefeated, wins seat #1. Alexander beat Clinton, and Alexander's worst loss (1%) is smaller than Clinton's worst loss (2%). Alexander wins seat #2. Is this proportional? I don't think so. The 49% who liked only Clinton have no way to get him 1 of the 2 seats. So 51% can take all. Unless the method is somehow modified to subtract out the ballots which have already served to elect candidates (Dole) before recalculating the remaining seats (Alexander vs Clinton), it won't be proportional. I don't know if there's a reasonable way to do this. Here's an attempt: After each seat is awarded, subtract S = Total_votes/N (where N is the total number of seats) from the seat winner's ballots before recalculating. The ballots which are subtracted are the ones which listed the winner as ranked first. If there aren't enough ranked-first ballots, also subtract ranked-second, etc. If there are more than enough ranked-first ballots (i.e., > S), then subtract appropriate fractions of each. Reworking the example using this new "multiseat pairwise": Dole wins seat #1. Since N=2, 50% of the ballots must be eliminated: First subtract all 26% {Dole Alexander Clinton} ballots, since these are the ones which ranked Dole 1st. Then subtract 24% from the ballots which ranked Dole 2nd. The recalculated pairings: 1% Alexander, Clinton (original25 - 24) 49% Clinton --- 50% The rest, giving Clinton seat #2, is left as an exercise. :-) It's an interesting question; I'm cc:ing it to election-methods-list. This looks a bit more complicated than STV. Is anything gained by using it instead of STV? And does this method have an established name? --Steve |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |